JURISDICTIONS UNKNOWN Federal District Courts are out of control proceeding in Jurisdictions unknown and thereby violating We the People’s right of due process. They proceed as master when in fact they are servants. Therefore, We the People COMMAND the United States Supreme Court to perform its Constitutional duty and COMMAND and inform by Writ Mandamus ALL inferior Federal District Courts’ obedience to the following:

JURISDICTIONS UNKNOWN 

Federal District Courts are out of control proceeding in Jurisdictions unknown and thereby violating We the People’s right of due process. 

They proceed as master when in fact they are servants. 

Therefore, We the People COMMAND the United States Supreme Court to perform its Constitutional duty and COMMAND and inform by Writ Mandamus ALL inferior Federal District Courts’ obedience to the following: 

1) “No judicial process, whatever form it may assume, can have any lawful authority outside of the limits of the jurisdiction of the court or judge by whom it is issued; and an attempt to enforce it beyond these boundaries is nothing less than lawless violence.” - Ableman v. Booth, 21 Howard 506 (1859) 

2) Judicial power shall extend to all cases in law or equity under this Constitution.13 3) The Law of the Land is Common Law. 4) All courts are to proceed under the Law of the Land. 14 5) Judges in equity cases are governed by American Jurisprudence which is founded under the Common Law. 

6) Courts of Law are Courts of Record. 
7) The Tribunal in a Court of Record is a Twelve (wo)man jury. 
8) The Jury decides both the facts and the law. 
9) The Jury maintains the power of Nullification. 
10) For every injury, there must be a remedy. 
11) For there to be a crime, there must be an injured party. 
12) In Courts of Record, there are no special proceedings. 
13) In Courts of Record, there are no summary proceedings. 
14) Courts of Record proceed according to the common law. 
15) Non-judicial foreclosures are a denial of due process. 
16) Denial of Habeas Corpus is a denial of due process. 
17) Admiralty and maritime law is not the Law of the Land. 
18) All courts are to cease from charging money for justice. 
19) All equity courts are to acknowledge American Jurisprudence’s 
       well-settled and well-understood rules, principles, and     
       precedents in all judicial decision making.17 
20) In equity cases, judges do not determine the law; they apply jurisprudence. 
21) When challenged, jurisdiction must be documented, shown, and proven18 
22) All courts are to acknowledge the unalienable rights of We the People19 
23) All judges are to obey the Law of the land20 
24) All judges are to make their oaths and bonds available from the clerk on demand.21 
25) All judges are to cease and desist all fictitious de facto courts or be subject to removal from office. 
26) Juries have a duty to give a verdict. If the jury is hung, they stay until they agree or agree to disagree and bring in an acquittal. 
27) Prosecutors do not have the authority to make a plea agreement; only the Grand Jury can make a plea agreement. 
28) A plea agreement with a threat of jail time is extortion. 
29) Once the Jury renders a verdict, it is final.22
30) “It is the duty of the courts to be watchful for the Constitutional rights of the citizen and against any stealthy encroachments thereon.” - Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 635 
31) “We (judges) have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the Constitution.” - Cohen v. Virginia, (1821), 6 Wheat. 264 and U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200 
32) 26 USC is not Law; 26 USC 7806(b) No inference23, implication24, or presumption25 of legislative26 construction shall be drawn or made by reason of the location or grouping of any particular section or provision or portion of this title, nor shall any table of contents, table of cross references, or similar outline, analysis, or descriptive matter relating to the contents of this title be given any legal effect. The preceding sentence also applies to the side-notes and ancillary tables contained in the various prints of this Act before its enactment into law. 
33) “The terms ‘equity’ and ‘chancery,’ ‘court of equity’ and ‘court of chancery,’ are constantly used as synonymous in the United States. It is presumed that this custom arises from the circumstance that the equity jurisdiction which is exercised by the courts of the various states is assimilated to that possessed by the English courts of chancery. Indeed, in some of the states it is made identical therewith by statute27 , so far as conformable to our institutions.” Wagner v. Armstrong, 93 Ohio St. 443, 113 N.E. 397, 401. This propagandized presumption of custom, not law, is antagonistic to the supremacy clause28 and serves only to suppress Justice. Equity courts proceeding according to the rules of chancery found in their unlawful beginnings in the Judiciary Act of 1789 which established the Judicial Courts of the United States. Whereas, the legislators exceeded their authority in an act repugnant to the constitution; it is therefore void.