Of HIS CLAIMS being rooted in sovereign citizen ideology. Specifically, Anderson cites THE CESTUI QUE VIE ACT of 1666 as basis for FEDERAL question jurisdiction and includes a document entitled ‘DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY[,]' both of which are tied to theories associated with the sovereign citizen movement.”) (internal citation omitted); Wood v. United States, 161 Fed.Cl. 30, 34 (Fed. Cl. 2022) (“Sovereign citizens also sometimes reference the CESTUI QUE VIE ACT of 1666, or a ‘CESTUI QUE VIE' TRUST, as support for their arguments in court.”). Further, Thomas's exhibits repeatedly purport to

 

Of HIS CLAIMS being rooted in sovereign citizen ideology. Specifically, Anderson cites THE CESTUI QUE VIE ACT of 1666 as basis for FEDERAL question jurisdiction and includes a document entitled ‘DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY[,]' both of which are tied to theories associated with the sovereign citizen movement.”) 

(internal citation omitted); Wood v. United States, 161 Fed.Cl. 30, 34 (Fed. Cl. 2022) (“Sovereign citizens also sometimes reference the CESTUI QUE VIE ACT of 1666, or a ‘CESTUI QUE VIE' TRUST, as support for their arguments in court.”). Further, Thomas's exhibits repeatedly purport to

https://www.reddit.com/r/CourtofAges/comments/1ayeupm/of_his_claims_being_rooted_in_sovereign_citizen/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3