Child Trafficking and Child Organ Harvesting

43 CFR § 3862.2-3 - Trustee to disclose nature of trust. Any party applying for patent as trustee must disclose fully the nature of the trust and the name of the CESTUI QUE TRUST; and such trustee, as well as the beneficiaries, must furnish satisfactory proof of citizenship; and the names of beneficiaries, as well as that of the trustee, must be inserted in the final certificate of entry.

CASE CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST - Thomas v. Progressive - Civil Action No.: 23-00225-TFM-B (S.D.Ala. Dec 29, 2023( Thomas further cites the “CESTUI QUE VIE ACT” as a basis for FEDERAL question jurisdiction. (Doc. 1 at 3). However, “[t]he CESTUI QUE VIE ACT, a 1666 ACT of PARLIAMENT, is an ENGLISH LAW that plainly does not provide a BASIS for FEDERAL question jurisdiction.” Mims, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226577, at *2, 2023 WL 8804324, at *1; see White, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184024, at *3-5, 2023 WL 6036842, at *2 (finding that plaintiff's reference to the “CESTUI QUE VIE ACT 1666” did not provide him with a colorable federal cause of action); Wood v. United States, 161 Fed.Cl. 30, 34-35 (Fed. Cl. 2022) (“Sovereign citizens also sometimes reference the CESTUI QUE VIE ACT OF 1666, or a ‘CESTUI QUE VIE' TRUST, as support for their arguments in court.... In short, the legal fiction presented by plaintiff in the complaint is not based in law but in the fantasies of the SOVEREIGN CITIZEN MOVEMENT. There is no jurisdiction in this court for fictitious claims.”).

CASE CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST - In re Noble Civil Action No: 20-CV-5777 (E.D.Pa Dec 7 2020) Canon 1304: Failure to provide a full accounting of the now former ESTATE of a dissolved CESTUI QUE (Vie) TRUST, including the return

CASE CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST - Champean v Rich Civil Action No: 1:16cv1254 (ATJ/MSN) E.D. VA. Nov. 10 2016) Dismissing as frivolous similar allegations Plaintiff then includes a Notice of Void Judgment, in which he argues that the courts to which members of the public currently have access "have no jurisdiction over living men. When the judge and the prosecutor use deceit and trickery to cause the living man to believe he is actually the defendant, those public officials have breached their fiduciary duties, and breached their contract with the public, and are subject to legal actions." Compl. at 10. Plaintiff asserts in a section entitled "Jurisdiction" that the burden of proving jurisdiction lies with "the asserter" - in this case, the named Defendants - but although they have "had time and 2 different chances to respond," they have "gone silent." Compl. at 11. Plaintiff "revokes rescinds and cancels all signatures," Compl. at 12, and declares himself the "Grantor and Sole beneficiary of the TASHEIK CHAMPEAN, SR. Cestui Que Vie trust, a document vessel under the United States registry . . . ." Compl. at 13 - 16. In a "caveat," Plaintiff observes that Defendants have "had every chance to respond to the Proof of Claim that was addressed and sent to them by Certified Mail" and declares that "for the Court Record,…

CASE CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST - Brown V. Virginia Civil action No: 3:17CV71 (E.D> Va Dec. 14 2017) Next, Brown provides for the "Appointment of Trustee" and a "Notice of Fiduciary Trusteeship Duty." (Id. at 10.) Brown declares himself the "Grantor and Sole Beneficiary of the Darrell Wayne Brown, Cestui Que Vie Trust, a documented vessel under United States registry . . . ." (Id.) Next, in a "Caveat," Brown observes that the Defendant "has had every opportunity to respond to the proof of claim instrument(s) that were addressed and sent to him/her by Certified Mail" and declares that "[f]or the Court record," the Defendant "must comply with the proof of claim answering each question that has been presented by affidavit form and sent back to the Court." (Id. at 12.) Brown then provides "Judicial Notice," and indicates that he "appoints" AUSA Kevin M. Comstock and his successors "as co-trustees for any judicial or administrative matter in which the Darrell Wayne Brown Cestui Que Vie Trust may be involved, past, present, and future, and specifically for Case No. 2:13CR00146-001," and that he "specifically appoint[s] the Co-Trustee(s) to settle and close the matter," "zeroing the account," while "exercis[ing] scrupulous good faith and candor towards, and for the…

CASE CASE CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST No. 14-22-00329-CV (Tex. App. AUG 2023) Now Comes Aggrieved party Lucas Nelson (hereinafter Aggrieved party), Sui Juris, Secured Party, NON-PERSON, NON-CITIZEN, NON-RESIDENT, NON-DEBTOR, NON-CORPORATED, NON-FICTION, NONSUBJECT, NON-PARTICIPANT in any government programs, a Living flesh and blood Man standing on the ground, Sovereign, under Special Appearance not Generally, NON-DEFENDANT, Holder-In-Due-Course of all of the “Enitity” Cestui Que Vie trust Lucas Nelson ©TM, representing the Corporate Fiction LUCAS NELSON©TM. Under no circumstances is the Plaintiff “Pro Se” as this Complaint is filed under the Holder-In-Due-Couse; Lucas Nelson of the “Cestui Que Vie Trust” of LUCAS NELSON.

CASE CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST - Johnson V Ohio - Case : 1:15CV0490 (N.D. Ohio Aug 11 2015 Pro se Plaintiff Andre Johnson filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the State of Ohio. In the Complaint, Plaintiff claims the State of Ohio has committed COMMERCIAL FRAUD with regard to HIS PROPERTY, the "STRAW-MAN TRUST," and the "CESTUI QUE (VIE) TRUSTS." (ECF No. 1 at 3). He seeks to "RECLAIM ALL PROPERTY, ACCOUNTS, ASSETS, etc.... Associated with his STRAW-MAN TRUST/CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST and any and All property accounts that the Secured Party is legally entitled to." (ECF No. 1 at 25).

CASE CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST Buess v. Internal REVENUE Serv. 3:14-cv-0826 (N.D. Ohio Oct 9 2014) In addition, Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee of $400 nor did he file an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Instead, he filed an untitled document in which he states, "the in forma pauperis forms have no basis in law [and] all costs relating to all cases filed shall be paid from the One Peoples Trust Account formerly known as CESTA QUE VIE TRUST." (ECF No. 3 at 4).

CASE CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST Gibbs V. State 31N.E.3d 38 IND. App 2015 On July 11, 2013, since no One can be Trustee of BOTH the CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST (Indeciperable) Trust and the Constructive Trust Case # 22D01-1302-MI-000001).

CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST ACT OF 1666 - THE LIVING INDIGENOUS VESSEL Other RELIEF the WILLIAM LEROY FAULKNER asks the COURT TO ORDER: ANY BASIS FOR Claiming that the WRONGS ALLEGED are Continiuing at the PRESENT TIME for all $ 50,000 FOR FALSE CLAIMS $1,000 Fine for every TIME name used for breach of CONTRACT, $47 Billion for BC and SSSN and all LABOR WAGES and INSURANCE POLICIES and NATIONAL SECURITIES DESPOSITS, MR PATRICK DIVINE and I deem fit.

CASE 4:22-cv-00528-DCN CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST ACT OF 1666 - THE LIVING INDIGENOUS VESSEL WILLIAM LEROY FAULKNER: STATEMENT OF CLAIM: By GIVING MY ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVELEDGES AWAY. ATTORNEY "Justin Olesen, charging and DISCUSSION with spouse how to COLLECT PAYMENT FROM ME. SPOUSE by not GIVING me MAIL for NOTICES and STATE for allowing this and U.S.A. for not protecting my DUE PROCESS.

CASE 4:22-cv-00528-DCN THE AMOUNT in CONTROVERSY CLAIM WILLIAM LEROY FAULKNER: CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST ACT OF 1666 - THE LIVING INDIGENOUS VESSEL Because all MY FAMILY and PEOPLES Lands have been CONFISCATED and BECAUSE of DISCLOSURE of INFORMATION was NOT TOLD TRUTHFUL in APPLYING PEN TO PAPER.

CLAIMS - Cestui Que Vie Act Of 1666 ACT -CASE 4:22-cv-00528-DCN CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST ACT OF 1666 - THE LIVING INDIGENOUS VESSEL THE COURT Basis for JURISDICTION. FEDERAL COURTS are courts limited JURDISDICTION (Limited power). Generally, only types of cases CAN BE HEARD in FEDERAL COURTS: Cases involving a FEDERAL Question and CASES involving DIVERSITY of CITIZENSHIP of the Parties. Under 28 U.S.C. 1332, a CASE arising under the UNITED STATES Constitution of FEDERAL LAWS or Treaties is a FEDERAL question CASE. Under 28. U.S.C. 1332, a case which is a Diversity of Citizenship CASE. In an DIVERSITY of Citizenship CASE, No defendant may be a Citizen of the SAME STATE as PLAINTIF. - FEDERAL QUESTION - DIVERSITY OF CITIZENSHIP

CLAIMS - Cestui Que Vie Act Of 1666 ACT -CASE 4:22-cv-00528-DCN 12-14-2023 WILLIAM LEROY FAULKNER, Plaintiff, v. LESLIE RAE DECKER, STATE OF IDAHO, U.S. of A., Defendants.

[Synopsis: Church = People = Trust The Vatican created a world trust using the birth certificate to capture the value of each individual's future productive energy.

Parsa et al v. Google L.L.C. et al Case: 3:19-cv-02407-CAB-AHG Civil Action No. 19cv2407-CAB-AHG 12/16/2019